Carrillo Maldonado v. Blanche
| ANA DE DIOS CARRILLO MALDONADO, ANDY OLIVEROS SANGUINO and NAILOVE VALENTINA OLIVEROS CARRILLO |
| TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 26-2023 |
| July 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, for (edit by court), on behalf of Petitioner Ana De Dios Carrillo Maldonado, Petitioner Andy Oliveros Sanguino, Petitioner Nailove Valentina Oliveros Carrillo, FILED. Service date 07/23/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 07/27/2026 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Todd Blanche, FILED. [Entered: 07/24/2026 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 07/24/2026 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Ana De Dios Carrillo Maldonado, Andy Oliveros Sanguino, Nailove Valentina Oliveros Carrillo, OPENED. [Entered: 07/24/2026 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Ana De Dios Carrillo Maldonado, Andy Oliveros Sanguino, Nailove Valentina Oliveros Carrillo, USCA receipt # A02-4497-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 07/24/2026 11:51 AM] [Edited: 07/24/2026 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 06/29/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/24/2026 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Ana De Dios Carrillo Maldonado, Andy Oliveros Sanguino, Nailove Valentina Oliveros Carrillo, FILED. [Entered: 07/24/2026 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
