Castro v. The City University of New York - New York City College of Technology
| JOSE CASTRO |
| CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, (CUNY), New York City College of Technology |
| 26-212 |
| February 2, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER, dated 03/13/2026, dismissing appeal by 04/03/2026, unless Appellant Jose Castro, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/13/2026 01:55 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER, dated 03/13/2026, dismissing appeal by 04/03/2026, unless Appellant Jose Castro, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/13/2026 01:49 PM] [Edited: 03/13/2026 01:51 PM]
|
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Steven Banks for Appellee City University of New York, TERMINATED. [Entered: 02/26/2026 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 11 LETTER, dated 02/23/2026, requesting to terminate counsel, on behalf of City University of New York, (CUNY), New York City College of Technology, RECEIVED. Service date 02/23/2026 by United States Mail. [Entered: 02/26/2026 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Steven Banks, in place of attorney Muriel Goode-Trufant, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 02/19/2026 07:05 AM] |
| Filing 9 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 02/18/2026 04:50 PM] [Edited: 02/19/2026 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to issue a limited remand to permit the district court, to hold the appeal in abeyance and other reliefs, at docket entry 7, on behalf of Appellant Jose Castro, copy to pro se appellant, FILED [Entered: 02/13/2026 01:58 PM] [Edited: 02/13/2026 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION, to issue a limited remand to permit the district court, to hold the appeal in abeyance and other reliefs on behalf of Appellant Jose Castro, FILED. Service date 02/11/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 02/13/2026 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 02/02/2026 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Jose Castro, OPENED. [Entered: 02/02/2026 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 02/02/2026 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Jose Castro, district court receipt #46441, FILED. [Entered: 02/02/2026 10:23 AM] [Edited: 02/02/2026 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 01/07/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 02/02/2026 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jose Castro, FILED. [Entered: 02/02/2026 10:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Castro v. The City University of New York - New York City College of Technology | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOSE CASTRO | |
| Represented By: | Jose Castro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, (CUNY), New York City College of Technology | |
| Represented By: | Muriel Goode-Trufant |
| Represented By: | Steven Banks |
| Represented By: | City University of New York |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
