De La Rosa v. United States of America
| MARIELA DE LA ROSA, Individually and as the Personal Representative and Administrator of the Estate of Felix Antonio De La Rosa Alvarez |
| J.F.K. ADVANCED MEDICAL P.C., MANUEL CEJA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTOPHER REID, BRUCE BIALOR, DUVINKA JORDAN, JOHN DOES, 1-10 Inclusive, GEORGE IOANNIDIS, PRIYESH PATEL, B.V. REDDY and CITIMEDICAL I PLLC |
| 26-2229 |
| August 11, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| TORTS INJURY-Med Malpractice |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Mariela De La Rosa, FILED. Service date 08/12/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/12/2026 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTE: See lead case, 26-76, containing complete set of docket entries. [Entered: 08/11/2026 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant J.F.K. Advanced Medical P.C., Manuel Ceja, OPENED. [Entered: 08/11/2026 03:08 PM] [Edited: 08/11/2026 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 08/11/2026 03:06 PM] [Edited: 08/11/2026 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant J.F.K. Advanced Medical P.C., Manuel Ceja, district court receipt #ANYEDC-20511085, FILED. [Entered: 08/11/2026 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 08/06/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 08/11/2026 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant J.F.K. Advanced Medical P.C., Manuel Ceja, FILED. [Entered: 08/11/2026 02:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.