United States of America v. Harris
| DARREL HARRIS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-2234 |
| August 11, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Darrel Harris, OPENED. [Entered: 08/11/2026 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 08/11/2026 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 08/10/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 08/11/2026 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Darrel Harris, FILED. [Entered: 08/11/2026 03:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Harris | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Nathan Rehn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DARREL HARRIS | |
| Represented By: | Megan Wolfe Benett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.