Gordon v. Order of the Rainbow
| AVA GORDON |
| ORDER OF THE RAINBOW, ORDER OF THE EASTERN STAR, PRINCE HALL FREEMASONS, YORK RITE FREEMASONS, SCOTTISH RITE FREEMASONS, DICK HAROLDSON, GERALDEAN SAMUELSON and AMY CHALLY |
| 26-2527 |
| September 11, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Matthew Vian Rotbart, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 09/11/2026 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE, to Order of the Rainbow, Prince Hall Freemasons,York Rite Freemasons, Scottish Rite Freemasons, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT. [Entered: 09/11/2026 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellees Dick Haroldson, Geraldean Samuelson, and Amy Chally, SENT. [Entered: 09/11/2026 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant Ava Gordon, SENT. [Entered: 09/11/2026 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 4 INTERLOCUTORY CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Ava Gordon, OPENED. [Entered: 09/11/2026 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 09/11/2026 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL, dated 08/20/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 09/11/2026 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Ava Gordon, FILED. [Entered: 09/11/2026 08:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
