Wright v. Cook
| IAN WRIGHT |
| ROBERT MARTIN, Correctional Warden, CARLOS NUNEZ, Correctional Deputy Warden, JONATHAN PEAU, Correctional Lieutenant, THOMAS WINTON, Correctional Lead Food Services Supervisor, ROLLIN COOK, Correctional Commissioner, ANGEL QUIROS, Correctional Commissioner, JESUS GUADARRAMA, Correctional Warden, SHARONDA CARLOS, Correctional District Administrator, RODREQUEZ, District Administrator, MICHAEL BIBENS, Correctional Nutritional Food Services Director and WILCOX, Correctional Food Service Supervision |
| 26-2667 |
| September 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 09/23/2026 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 7 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 09/23/2026 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Ian Wright, OPENED. [Entered: 09/23/2026 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 09/23/2026 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 09/18/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 09/23/2026 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/23/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 09/23/2026 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, dated 10/21/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 09/23/2026 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Ian Wright, FILED. [Entered: 09/23/2026 03:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
