Manigaulte v. Eversource Energy
| JOHN C. MANIGAULTE and DAVID A. SIUDZINSKI |
| EVERSOURCE ENERGY, Holding Company, CONNECTICUT PUBLIC UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY, DAVID SHERRY, In their Individual and Official Capacities, ROSALIND GWYNN, In their Individual and Official Capacities, JEFFREY R. GAUDIOSI, In their Individual and Official Capacities, STEVE CAPOZZI, In their Individual and Official Capacities, CONNECTICUT LIGHT & POWER COMPANY, ERMELINDA RUIZ-FLYNN, other Defendants in both their Individual and Official Capacities, NED LAMONT, Governor, other Defendants in both their Individual and Official Capacities, DAVE DOE, (Meter Tester) last name unknown, other Defendants in both their Individual and Official Capacities and JOSEPH R. NOLAN, JR., other Defendants in both their Individual and Official Capacities |
| 26-2734 |
| September 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Americans w/Disibilities Act-O |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigants, SENT. [Entered: 09/30/2026 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant John C. Manigaulte, David A. Siudzinski, OPENED. [Entered: 09/30/2026 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 09/30/2026 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 09/24/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 09/30/2026 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 09/15/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 09/30/2026 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant John C. Manigaulte, David A. Siudzinski, FILED. [Entered: 09/30/2026 09:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
