Lewis v. Williamson County, Texas
| SCOTT PHILLIP LEWIS |
| COUNTY OF WILLIAMSON, TEXAS, CITY OF AUSTIN, A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, LLC, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, HEARST CORPORATION, METROGOLDWYNMAYER INC., BIG FISH ENTERTAINMENT, VANDEGRIFT LACROSSE CLUB BOOSTER ORGANIZATION, MARK WILLIAMS, Vice President of Vandegrift Lacrosse Club Booster Organization, DAVID UHL, President of Vandegrift Lacrosse Club Booster Organization, RACHEL MCKINLEY, DAN ABRAMS and ROBERT CHODY |
| 26-2835 |
| October 7, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Americans w/Disibilities Act-O |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE, to A&E Television Networks, LLC, The Walt Disney Company, Hearst Corporation, MetroGoldwynMayer Inc., Big Fish Entertainment, Vandegrift Lacrosse Club Booster Organization, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT. [Entered: 10/07/2026 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellees Mark Williams, David Uhl, Rachel Mckinley, Dan Abrams, Robert Chody, SENT. [Entered: 10/07/2026 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 10/07/2026 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Scott Phillip Lewis, OPENED. [Entered: 10/07/2026 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 10/07/2026 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 08/04/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/07/2026 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Scott Phillip Lewis, FILED. [Entered: 10/07/2026 02:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
