Jones v. Hochul
| DANIEL JONES |
| ELIZABETH S. FORTINO, Director, Mental Hygiene Legal Service, BENJAMIN D. AGATA, Attorney, MHLS, MEGAN E. DORR, Principal Attorney, MHLS, JOSEPH M. BETAR, Senior Attorney, MHLS, KEVIN D. WILSON, Former Acting Director, MHLS, KATHLEEN C. HOCHUL, Governor, LETITIA JAMES, N.Y.S. Attorney General, ANN MARIE T. SULLIVAN, M.D., Commissioner, LI-WEN GRACE LEE, M.D., Associate Commissioner, JOHN/JANE DOES, Office of Mental Health, Elizabeth S. Fontino, SARAH M. FALLON, Former Director, MHLS and MENTAL HEALTH LEGAL SERVICES, MHLS |
| 26-2981 |
| October 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Kadeem Okoye Wolliaston, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 5 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Jones, OPENED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 09/30/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUMDECISION AND ORDER, dated 09/30/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Jones, FILED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
