Diederich, Jr. v. Ford Harrison LLP
| MICHAEL D. DIEDERICH, JR. |
| FORD HARRISON LLP, MARK SALOMAN, ANDREA MOSS, MOSS & BYRNES, PLLC and GEBRIAL RASMY |
| 26-2985 |
| October 20, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 10/21/2026 08:02 AM] |
| Filing 10 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se appellee, SENT. [Entered: 10/20/2026 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 9 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Michael D. Diederich, OPENED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 8 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Michael D. Diederich, district court receipt # ANYSDC33635631, FILED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM ORDER, dated 09/21/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM ORDER, dated 08/21/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 08/04/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 08/03/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 06/15/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 03/19/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 12:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Michael D. Diederich, FILED. [Entered: 10/20/2026 12:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
