Diamond Tucker St. Property, LLC v. Pupovic
| DIAMOND TUCKER ST. PROPERTY, LLC, REDEMPTION, LLC and WESTFAIR, LLC |
| KAREN PUPOVIC and ISMET PUPOVIC |
| 26-3026 |
| October 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| REAL PROP-Torts to Land |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER, directing appeals 26-3026 and 26-3038 to be heard in tandem, FILED. [26-3026, 26-3038] [Entered: 10/22/2026 03:54 PM]
|
| Filing 7 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Mark A. Rubeo, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 10/22/2026 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 6 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Sharman Toby Propp, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 10/22/2026 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellants Diamond Tucker St. Property, LLC, Redemption, LLC, Westfair, LLC, OPENED. [Entered: 10/22/2026 08:36 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 10/22/2026 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellants Diamond Tucker St. Property, LLC, Redemption, LLC, Westfair, LLC, district court receipt # ANYSDC33641060, FILED. [Entered: 10/22/2026 08:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 10/15/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/22/2026 08:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellants Diamond Tucker St. Property, LLC, Redemption, LLC, Westfair, LLC, FILED. [Entered: 10/22/2026 08:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.