Puppolo v. Decato
| CELESTE PUPPOLO, Individually and Executor of the estate of Eva C. Puppolo |
| ENE EVALUATOR, EACH EMPLOYEE OR OFFICER OF DECATO LAW OFFICE OR SURETY OR ANY UNKNOWN PARTIES OR PERSONS WHO CAUSED HARM TO PLAINTIFFS, DECATO LAW OFFICE, P.C. and R. PETER DECATO, Esq. |
| 26-3092 |
| October 28, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CONTRACT-Other Contract Action |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Defendant ENE Evaluator, TERMINATED. [Entered: 10/29/2026 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, James Cooley, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 10/29/2026 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 6 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Timothy B. Fair, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 10/28/2026 02:54 PM] [Edited: 10/28/2026 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Celeste Puppolo, OPENED. [Entered: 10/28/2026 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Celeste Puppolo, district court receipt #AVTDC-2282496, FILED. [Entered: 10/28/2026 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 09/30/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/28/2026 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING ALTERNATIVE MOTION, AND DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, dated 09/30/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/28/2026 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Celeste Puppolo, FILED. [Entered: 10/28/2026 02:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
