Beast v. Melber
| RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Former Client of Paul Gardner, Esquire of Gardner Law Group of Baltimore, Maryland as Attorney for Outcast, Mya, Mos Def, Tommy Davidson, and Salahis, SATISH DAT BEAST, Former Client of "Larry Birkhead Attorney" Nancy Hass of Hallandale Beach, Florida as Family Law Attorney and GO GO SATISH, Former Client of Thomas Hart, Esquire of On the Potomac of Washington, DC and Holland & Knight, LLP and Entertainment Attorney for Gloria Estefan and James Todd Smith also Known as LL Cool J |
| ARI MELBER, of MSNOW (Journalist Who Covers Hip Hop Music), UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP N.V., NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, PEACOCK TV LLC, VIVENDI UNIVERSAL, of France, COMCAST CORPORATION, MS NOW, NBC NEWS and NBC |
| 26-496 |
| March 4, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| TORTS INJURY-Other Personal |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, for declaratory judgment, preliminary injunction, summary judgment, at docket entry 11, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/12/2026 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, LR 31.2 Scheduling Notification, at docket entry 10, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/12/2026 08:33 AM] |
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Oral Argument Statement LR 34.1(a), at docket entry 9, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/12/2026 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, at docket entry 8, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/12/2026 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 7, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 03/12/2026 08:24 AM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION, for declaratory judgment, preliminary injunction, summary judgment, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit, FILED. No Service. [Entered: 03/12/2026 08:17 AM] |
| Filing 10 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit, informing Court of proposed due date 03/09/2026, RECEIVED. No Service. [Entered: 03/12/2026 08:14 AM] |
| Filing 9 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit, FILED. No Service. [Entered: 03/12/2026 08:12 AM] |
| Filing 8 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit, FILED. No Service. [Entered: 03/12/2026 08:10 AM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit, FILED. No Service. [Entered: 03/12/2026 08:09 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 03/04/2026 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE, to Universal Music Group N.V., NBCUniversal Media, LLC, Peacock TV LLC, Vivendi Universal, Comcast Corporation, MS NOW, NBC News, NBC, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT. [Entered: 03/04/2026 01:30 PM] [Edited: 03/04/2026 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 INTERLOCUTORY CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit, OPENED. [Entered: 03/04/2026 01:26 PM] [Edited: 03/04/2026 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 03/04/2026 01:24 PM] [Edited: 03/04/2026 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry 5, dated 02/12/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 03/04/2026 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Ronald Satish Emrit, FILED. [Entered: 03/04/2026 01:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
