Manta Industries Ltd. v. Law
| MANTA INDUSTRIES LTD., a foreign P.R. of China Corporation |
| PAUL P. LAW, LOURDES LAW, YOGESH M. ANAND, KUM S. CASANOVA, JONATHAN M. ANAND, Paul Law, Lou Law, Lourdes P. Law, Lourdes W. Law, Yogesh Anand, Yogi Anand, RICH KIDS JEAN CORP., FASHION DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., FOLDOM INDUSTRIES, LTD., DANI MAX DESIGN, INC., NY GROUP CORPORATION, Kum Casanova, Kum Sun Casanova, Q FOLLOW SHIPPING, INC., Jon Anand, Jonathan N. Anand, J GROUP NY INC, XYZ, INCS 110, ABC, LLCS 110, JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10 and FASHION INDUSTRIES, LTD. |
| 26-51 |
| January 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| TORTS PROPERTY-Fraud |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 REPLY BRIEF, on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, FILED. Service date 07/06/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/06/2026 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 31 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of Appellee Manta Industries Ltd., FILED. Service date 06/26/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/26/2026 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 30 ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT LR 34.1 (a), on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, FILED. Service date 06/22/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/22/2026 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 29 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, informing Court of proposed due date 07/13/2026, RECEIVED. Service date 06/22/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/22/2026 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 28 BRIEF, on behalf of Appellee Manta Industries Ltd., FILED. Service date 06/22/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/22/2026 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 27 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellee Manta Industries Ltd., Brief due date as 06/26/2026, FILED. [Entered: 04/01/2026 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 26 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellee Manta Industries Ltd., informing Court of proposed due date 06/26/2026, RECEIVED. Service date 03/31/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/31/2026 06:07 PM] |
| Filing 25 JOINT APPENDIX, volume 5 of 5, (pp. 1091 - 1362), on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, FILED. Service date 03/31/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/31/2026 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 24 JOINT APPENDIX, volume 4 of 5, (pp. 819 - 1090), on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, FILED. Service date 03/31/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/31/2026 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 23 JOINT APPENDIX, volume 3 of 5, (pp. 545 - 818), on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, FILED. Service date 03/31/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/31/2026 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 22 JOINT APPENDIX, volume 2 of 5, (pp. 273 - 544), on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, FILED. Service date 03/31/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/31/2026 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 21 JOINT APPENDIX, volume 1 of 5, (pp. 1 - 272), on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, FILED. Service date 03/31/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/31/2026 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 20 BRIEF & SPECIAL APPENDIX, on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, FILED. Service date 03/31/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 03/31/2026 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 19 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Lourdes Law, Paul P. Law, Brief due date as 04/13/2026, Appendix due date as 04/13/2026, FILED. [Entered: 01/29/2026 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 18 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, informing Court of proposed due date 04/13/2026, RECEIVED. Service date 01/28/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/28/2026 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 17 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, at entry 15, on behalf of Appellee Manta Industries Ltd., FILED. [Entered: 01/20/2026 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 16 NEW CASE MANAGER, Sandra Balbuena, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 01/20/2026 09:17 AM] |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Manta Industries Ltd., FILED. Service date 01/16/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/16/2026 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance, at docket entry 12, on behalf of Appellee Manta Industries Ltd., FILED. [Entered: 01/16/2026 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 13 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, FILED. Service date 01/14/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/14/2026 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Manta Industries Ltd., FILED. [Entered: 01/14/2026 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, FILED. Service date 01/13/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/13/2026 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 10 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Paul P. Law, Appellant Lourdes Law, FILED. Service date 01/13/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/13/2026 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 01/12/2026 08:03 AM] |
| Filing 8 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Lourdes Law, Paul P. Law, OPENED. [Entered: 01/09/2026 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Lourdes Law, Paul P. Law, district court receipt # ANYSDC32230369, FILED. [Entered: 01/09/2026 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 6 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/16/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/09/2026 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 5 DISTRICT COURT FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, dated 12/02/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/09/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/02/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/09/2026 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 10/01/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/09/2026 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 08/12/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/09/2026 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Lourdes Law, Paul P. Law, FILED. [Entered: 01/09/2026 02:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.