Flores-Palma v. Bondi
| JOSE ARMANDO FLORES-PALMA |
| PAMELA BONDI, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 26-91 |
| January 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yenni Liu, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 01/28/2026 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 15 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 01/28/2026, determining the appeal to OIL, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 01/28/2026 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to voluntarily dismiss this petition for review at docket entry 13 on behalf of Petitioner Jose Armando Flores-Palma, denying as moot motion to dismiss at docket entry 7 on behalf of Respondent Pamela Bond and motion for extension of time at docket entry 11 on behalf of Petitioner Jose Armando Flores-Palma, FILED. [Entered: 01/28/2026 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION, to withdraw appeal, on behalf of Petitioner Jose Armando Flores-Palma, FILED. Service date 01/27/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/27/2026 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 12 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD, FILED [Entered: 01/21/2026 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION, for extension of time, on behalf of Petitioner Jose Armando Flores-Palma, FILED. Service date 01/21/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/21/2026 10:20 AM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Zoey Jones for Petitioner Jose Armando Flores-Palma, ADDED. [Entered: 01/20/2026 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Jose Armando Flores-Palma, FILED. [Entered: 01/20/2026 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Jose Armando Flores-Palma, FILED. Service date 01/16/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/16/2026 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION, to dismiss, on behalf of Respondent Pamela Bondi, FILED. Service date 01/16/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/16/2026 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Giovanni Di Maggio, in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 01/15/2026 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Pamela Bondi, FILED. [Entered: 01/15/2026 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 01/15/2026 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Jose Armando Flores-Palma, OPENED. [Entered: 01/15/2026 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 12/17/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/15/2026 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Jose Armando Flores-Palma, FILED. [Entered: 01/15/2026 11:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Flores-Palma v. Bondi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOSE ARMANDO FLORES-PALMA | |
| Represented By: | Ilana R. Herr |
| Represented By: | Zoey Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: PAMELA BONDI, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Marie Arnold |
| Represented By: | Giovanni Di Maggio |
| Represented By: | Oil Oil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.