Feeman v. Bridge It, Inc.
| ROBERT FEEMAN, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, GUSTAVO GILLY, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated and MICHAEL COLLINS, Individually and on behalf of all other simiarly situated |
| BRIDGE IT, INC. and Brigit |
| 26-959 |
| April 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Consumer Credit |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 JOINT APPENDIX, volume 1 of 1, (pp. JA001 - JA200), on behalf of Appellant Bridge It, Inc., FILED. Service date 06/12/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/12/2026 06:58 PM] |
| Filing 20 BRIEF & SPECIAL APPENDIX, on behalf of Appellant Bridge It, Inc., FILED. Service date 06/12/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/12/2026 06:54 PM] |
| Filing 19 CAMP ORDER, The Courts Order dated April 29, 2026 scheduling a mediation with the Civil Appeals Mediation Program (CAMP) for July 1, 2026 is hereby VACATED, ENTERED. [Entered: 06/10/2026 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 18 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Bridge It, Inc.'s, Brief due date as 06/12/2026, Appendix due date as 06/12/2026, FILED. [Entered: 04/30/2026 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 17 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Bridge It, Inc., informing Court of proposed due date 06/12/2026, RECEIVED. Service date 04/30/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 04/30/2026 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 16 CAMP ORDER, Type of Conference: Telephonic, Scheduled Date of Conference: 07/01/2026, Start Time: 10:30 AM, Required Attendees: Counsel Only, with Mediator Kathleen M. Scanlon, ENTERED. [Entered: 04/29/2026 07:45 AM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY, James Kim, Kaitland Kennelly, Hugh Hamilton, for Appellant Bridge It, Inc., ADDED. [Entered: 04/28/2026 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Bridge It, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 04/27/2026 07:28 PM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Bridge It, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 04/27/2026 07:24 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Bridge It, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 04/27/2026 07:18 PM] |
| Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Robert Feeman, Appellee Gustavo Gilly, Appellee Michael Collins, FILED. Service date 04/27/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 04/27/2026 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 10 NEW CASE MANAGER, Evelyn Cruz, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 04/27/2026 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Bridge It, Inc., FILED. Service date 04/24/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 04/24/2026 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 8 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Bridge It, Inc., FILED. Service date 04/24/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 04/24/2026 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 7 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Bridge It, Inc., FILED. Service date 04/24/2026 by ACMS. [Entered: 04/24/2026 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 04/14/2026 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 5 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Randall Keith Pulliam, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 04/14/2026 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 INTERLOCUTORY CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Bridge It, Inc., OPENED. [Entered: 04/14/2026 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Bridge It, Inc., district court receipt #ANYSDC32690539, FILED. [Entered: 04/14/2026 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 03/30/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/14/2026 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Bridge It, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 04/14/2026 04:23 PM] [Edited: 04/14/2026 04:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.