Alexander Introcaso v. Thomas Bennis
ALEXANDER M. INTROCASO |
THOMAS J. BENNIS, JAMES T. SPANG, JR., JAMES M. POLYAK, KEVIN B. CURRY, PATRICK L. MEEHAN, SETH WEBER, JAMES MARTIN, KENNETH C. HELBERT and DENNIS W. STECKEL |
08-1318 |
January 30, 2008 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2008. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER (BARRY, CHAGARES and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges) dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction, filed. Panel No.: DCO-108. Michael A. Chagares, Authoring Judge. (MB) [Entered: 07/02/2008 10:15 AM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Andrew K. Parker, Esq. for Appellant Mr. Alexander M. Introcaso. (MB) [Entered: 03/04/2008 07:32 AM] |
CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Mr. Alexander M. Introcaso, received. (MB) [Entered: 03/04/2008 07:38 AM] |
CONCISE SUMMARY OF THE CASE on behalf of Appellant Mr. Alexander M. Introcaso, received. (MB) [Entered: 03/04/2008 07:40 AM] |
RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Mr. Alexander M. Introcaso to clerk Jurisdictional defect advising of possible dismissal, received. Certificate of Service dated 02/27/2008. (MB) [Entered: 03/04/2008 07:45 AM] |
TRANSCRIPT PURCHASE ORDER FORM (Part 1), filed. No proceedings in District Court. (MB) [Entered: 03/04/2008 08:21 AM] |
FOLLOW UP LETTER to Andrew K. Parker, Esq. for dkt-08-1318 requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 03/13/2008. Information Statement on or before 03/13/2008. Concise Summary on or before 03/13/2008. Transcript Purchase Order on or before 03/13/2008. (MB) [Entered: 02/28/2008 02:33 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Robert E. Sletvold, Esq. for Appellees James Martin, Kenneth C. Helbert and Dennis W. Steckel in 08-1318. (MB) [Entered: 02/20/2008 04:08 PM] |
RESPONSE on behalf of Appellees Kenneth C. Helbert, James Martin and Dennis W. Steckel to clerk Jurisdictional defect advising of possible dismissal, received. Certificate of Service dated 02/12/2008. (MB) [Entered: 02/29/2008 02:05 PM] |
RESPONSE on behalf of Appellees Kevin B. Curry, Patrick L. Meehan and Seth Weber to clerk Jurisdictional defect advising of possible dismissal, received. Certificate of Service dated 02/14/2008. (MB) [Entered: 02/15/2008 08:37 AM] |
FOLLOW UP LETTER to Andrew K. Parker, Esq. for dkt-08-1318 requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form, Information Statement, Concise Summary and Transcript Purchase Order on or before 02/27/2008. (MB) [Entered: 02/13/2008 03:50 PM] |
FOLLOW UP LETTER to Jeffrey S. Dimmig, Esq. and Robert D. Sletvold, Esq. for dkt-08-1318 requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 02/27/2008. (MB) [Entered: 02/13/2008 04:08 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Gerald B. Sullivan, Esq. for Appellees Kevin B. Curry, Patrick L. Meehan and Seth Weber in 08-1318. (MB) [Entered: 02/13/2008 10:31 AM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney James M. Polyak, Esq. for Appellee James M. Polyak in 08-1318. (MB) [Entered: 02/12/2008 09:57 AM] |
RESPONSE on behalf of Appellees Thomas J. Bennis and James T. Spang, Jr. to clerk Jurisdictional defect advising of possible dismissal, filed. Certificate of Service dated 02/01/2008. (MB) [Entered: 02/04/2008 03:08 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Attorney(s) Richard L. Orloski for party(s) Appellees Thomas J. Bennis & James T. Spang Jr., in case 08-1318. (MB) [Entered: 02/04/2008 02:57 PM] |
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (MB) [Entered: 01/30/2008 11:11 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER to counsel advising appeal has been listed for possible dismissal. (MB) [Entered: 01/30/2008 11:48 AM] |
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Alexander M. Introcaso. (MB) [Entered: 01/30/2008 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.