Diane Bastl v. Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, et al
| DIANE E. BASTL |
| CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, a subsidiary of Citizens Financial Group, Inc., TDBA Citizens Bank and CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP INC |
| 08-4228 |
| October 23, 2008 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Jobs |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Diane Bastl v. Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: DIANE E. BASTL | |
| Represented By: | Gianni Floro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, a subsidiary of Citizens Financial Group, Inc., TDBA Citizens Bank | |
| Represented By: | James P. Hollihan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP INC | |
| Represented By: | James P. Hollihan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
