Hackensack Univ Med Ctr v. Kathleen Sebeliu
Plaintiff - Appellant: HACKENSACK UNIV MED CTR
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Health and Human Services
Defendant - Rule 43 Substitution: CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Case Number: 09-3703
Filed: September 24, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Ovrpmnts Under the Medicare Act
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hackensack Univ Med Ctr v. Kathleen Sebeliu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: HACKENSACK UNIV MED CTR
Represented By: Clifton S. Elgarten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, Health and Human Services
Represented By: Susan Handler-Menahem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - rule 43 substitution: CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Represented By: Leah A. Bynon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?