Ted McCracken v. Ford Mtr Co, et al
Defendant: CHECKER FLAG INC and WILLIAM CLAY FORD
Plaintiff / Appellant: TED AARON MCCRACKEN
Defendant / Appellee: FORD MOTOR CO and CHAPMAN FORD
Not Yet Classified: J. L. FREED
Case Number: 09-3995
Filed: October 27, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury-Product Liability
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2011 NOTICE from U.S. Supreme Court. Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed by Ted A. McCracken on 11/01/2010. Supreme Court Case No. 10-7327. (NMB) [Entered: 01/11/2011 10:07 AM]
January 11, 2011 NOTICE of U.S. Supreme Court disposition at No. 10-7327. Petition for Writ of Ceriorari filed by Ted A. McCracken denied on 01/10/2011. (NMB) [Entered: 01/11/2011 10:08 AM]
August 25, 2010 MANDATE ISSUED, filed. (TNH) [Entered: 08/25/2010 09:29 AM]
August 3, 2010 JUDGMENT, Affirmed judgment of the District Court entered September 16, 2009. (MB) [Entered: 08/03/2010 10:21 AM]
August 3, 2010 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: SLOVITER, AMBRO and SMITH, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 7. ALD-249 (MB) [Entered: 08/03/2010 10:16 AM]
July 22, 2010 SUBMITTED for possible summary action, response and Rule 28(j) letter.. Panel ID: ALD-249. Coram: Sloviter, Ambro and Smith, Circuit Judges. (MB) [Entered: 08/03/2010 10:09 AM]
May 4, 2010 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for possible summary action. (WW) [Entered: 05/04/2010 09:48 AM]
April 16, 2010 RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Mr. Ted A. McCracken to attorney Motion for summary action, filed. (SLC) [Entered: 05/07/2010 11:20 AM]
April 1, 2010 ECF FILER: Letter dated 04/01/2010 , filed pursuant to Rule 28(j) from counsel for Appellee Ford Mtr Co. This document will be SENT TO THE MERITS PANEL, if/when applicable. (KAW) [Entered: 04/01/2010 02:06 PM]
March 23, 2010 Opinion or Order ORDER (Clerk) staying the briefing schedule pending determination of the motion for summary affirmance. Should the Court deny the motion or refer it to the merits panel, appellant's brief will be due within 30 days of the issuance of that order. Appellant may have an additional 21 days from the date of this order to file a response to the motion for summary affirmance. Denying as unnecessary Appellant's request for permission to access the Court via the Court's electronic filing system. Appellant may register as a CM/ECF user in the Third Circuit, filed. (SLC) [Entered: 03/23/2010 11:39 AM]
March 1, 2010 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Ford Mtr Co to Motion by Appellant for Extension of Time. Certificate of Service dated 03/01/2010.--[Edited 03/04/2010 by SLC] (KAW) [Entered: 03/01/2010 02:21 PM]
February 25, 2010 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee Ford Mtr Co to Motion by appellant for Extension of Time. Certificate of Service dated 02/25/2010.--[Edited 03/04/2010 by SLC] (KAW) [Entered: 02/25/2010 01:28 PM]
February 22, 2010 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ted A. McCracken for Extension of Time to File Brief Pursuant to F.R.A.P. 31.4 and for Permission to Access the Court Via the Electronic Court Filing System, filed. (SLC) [Entered: 03/04/2010 11:31 AM]
February 16, 2010 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ted A. McCracken titled "Motion of Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendant Motor Company Motion for Summary Affirmance and for Permission to Access the Court Via the Electronic Court Filing System", filed. (SLC) [Entered: 02/23/2010 04:36 PM]
January 22, 2010 ECF FILER: MOTION filed by Appellee Ford Mtr Co for Summary Affirmance. Certificate of Service dated 01/22/2010.--[Edited 01/29/2010 by SLC] (CST) [Entered: 01/22/2010 05:01 PM]
January 13, 2010 ECF FILER: LETTER on behalf of Attorney Katherine A. Wang, Esq. for Appellee Ford Mtr Co. Certificate of Service dated 01/13/2010. (KAW) [Entered: 01/13/2010 11:17 AM]
January 13, 2010 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Ted A. McCracken due on or before 02/22/2010. Appendix due on or before 02/22/2010. (SLC) [Entered: 01/13/2010 10:46 AM]
December 10, 2009 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Sharon L. Caffrey, Esq. for Ford Mtr Co and Chapman Ford and Alessandro A. Giribaldi, Esq. for Checker Flag Incorporated requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 12/24/2009. Disclosure Statement on or before 12/24/2009. (SLC) [Entered: 12/10/2009 01:47 PM]
December 7, 2009 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Katherine A. Wang on behalf of Appellee(s) Ford Motor Company. (KAW) [Entered: 12/07/2009 03:46 PM]
December 7, 2009 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Tiffany M. Alexander on behalf of Appellee(s) Ford Motor Company. (TMA) [Entered: 12/07/2009 02:03 PM]
December 3, 2009 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Ford Mtr Co, filed. (CST) [Entered: 12/03/2009 03:11 PM]
November 30, 2009 ECF FILER: LETTER by Tracey M. Hagan, Esq., to withdraw Appellee J. L. Freed from appeal. Certificate of Service dated 10/30/09.--[Edited 12/01/2009 by SLC]--[Edited 12/01/2009 by SLC] (TMH) [Entered: 11/30/2009 03:34 PM]
November 5, 2009 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from C. Scott Toomey on behalf of Appellee(s) Ford Motor Company. (CST) [Entered: 11/05/2009 11:34 AM]
October 27, 2009 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 10/27/2009 01:39 PM]
October 27, 2009 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Ted A. McCracken. (CJG) [Entered: 10/27/2009 01:34 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ted McCracken v. Ford Mtr Co, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: TED AARON MCCRACKEN
Represented By: Ted Aaron McCracken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FORD MOTOR CO
Represented By: Tiffany M. Alexander Esq.
Represented By: Sharon L. Caffrey Esq.
Represented By: C. Scott Toomey Esq.
Represented By: Katherine A. Wang Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHAPMAN FORD
Represented By: Sharon L. Caffrey Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHECKER FLAG INC
Represented By: Alessandro A. Giribaldi Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM CLAY FORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: J. L. FREED
Represented By: Tracey M. Hagan Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?