Anthony Keyter v. 14535 US Government Officers, et al
| ANTHONY P. KEYTER |
| 14535 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT OFFICERS, see D.I. 1 for details, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE GOVERNMENTS OF THE 50 STATES, FORD MOTOR CO, BOEING CO, AIR INDIA, UNITED NATIONS, NATO, MICHAEL J. TURNER and MAUREEN E. KEYTER |
| 10-2209 |
| May 4, 2010 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a), for failure to pay the filing fee for the notice of appeal. Case terminated on 06/01/2010. (ARR) [Entered: 06/01/2010 09:58 AM] |
| RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Mr. Anthony P. Keyter to Legal Division letter advising of possible summary action, filed. Certificate of Service dated 05/26/2010. (ARR) [Entered: 06/01/2010 09:53 AM] |
| Letter dated May 10, 2010 on behalf of Appellant regarding International Terroris Plot. Certificate of Service dated 05/10/2010. (ARR) [Entered: 05/26/2010 02:36 PM] |
| APPEAL BRIEF AND EXHIBITS IN RESPONSE to Legal Division letter advising of possible summary action filed on behalf of Appellant Mr. Anthony P. Keyter, filed. Certificate of Service dated 05/10/2010. (ARR) [Entered: 05/26/2010 02:31 PM] |
| LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for possible summary action. (CLJ) [Entered: 05/11/2010 02:29 PM] |
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (ARR) [Entered: 05/04/2010 04:17 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Anthony P. Keyter. (ARR) [Entered: 05/04/2010 03:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
