Feng Li, et al v. Atty Gen USA
| FENG ZHI LI, YU FANG CHEN, ZHU YU CHEN and ZHEN HUA CHEN |
| ATTY GEN USA |
| 11-1761 |
| March 24, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3010926725
Calendared for Monday, 07/02/2012.
|
|
Filing
3010703052
ORDER (Clerk) directing the parties to file a status report within seven (7) days of the date of this Order.
|
|
Filing
3010565435
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Petitioner Yu Fang Chen, Petitioner Zhen Hua Chen, Petitioner Zhu Yu Chen and Petitioner Feng Zhi Li due on or before 07/26/2011. Appendix due on or before 07/26/2011.
|
|
Filing
3010544896
NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Attorney Chun W. Wong, Esq. for Petitioners Yu Fang Chen, Zhen Hua Chen, Zhu Yu Chen and Feng Zhi Li requesting the Motion to Reinstate Petition and the Agency Docketing Statement need to be docketed as seperate entries. Compliance due 06/01/2011.
|
|
Filing
3010539087
NONCOMPLIANCE ORDER sent to Attorney Chun W. Wong, Esq. for Petitioners Zhen Hua Chen, Zhu Yu Chen, Feng Zhi Li and Yu Fang Chen requesting electronic version of the Motion to Reinstate Petition, Entry of Apperance and the Agency Docketing Statement. Compliance due 05/26/2011.
|
|
Filing
3010518208
CLERK ORDER dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR Misc. 107.2, for failure to file the entry of appearance and agency docketing statement. Case terminated on 05/02/2011.
|
|
Filing
3010479075
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
