Martinez v. Atty Gen USA
Petitioner: ERASMO ANIBAL MARTINEZ
Respondent: ATTY GEN USA
Case Number: 11-2258
Filed: May 11, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 6, 2012 Summary Martinez v. Atty Gen. of the U.S.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3010850507 Oral Argument Notification for Wednesday, 04/11/2012.
January 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3010788243 Calendared for Thursday, 04/12/2012.
May 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3010528832 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Martinez v. Atty Gen USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ERASMO ANIBAL MARTINEZ
Represented By: Erasmo Anibal Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTY GEN USA
Represented By: Eric H. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?