Yan Ye v. Atty Gen USA
| YAN YUN YE, a/k/a Zhang Jian Fen |
| ATTY GEN USA |
| 11-3066 |
| August 2, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3010818522
Calendared for Thursday, 03/08/2012.
|
|
Filing
3010689432
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Petitioner Yan Yun Ye due on or before 11/28/2011. Appendix due on or before 11/28/2011.
|
|
Filing
3010658078
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record.
|
|
Filing
3010613952
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Yan Ye v. Atty Gen USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: YAN YUN YE, a/k/a Zhang Jian Fen | |
| Represented By: | Gary J. Yerman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTY GEN USA | |
| Represented By: | Eric H. Holder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
