Pedro Ramos-Lara v. Atty Gen USA
Petitioner: PEDRO RAMOS-LARA
Respondent: ATTY GEN USA
Case Number: 11-3230
Filed: August 17, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3010686071 CLERK ORDER dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR Misc. 107.2(b), for failure to file a brief and appendix on behalf of appellant. Case terminated on 10/14/2011.
August 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3010636373 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Petitioner Pedro Ramos-Lara due on or before 10/04/2011. Appendix due on or before 10/04/2011.
August 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3010628481 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pedro Ramos-Lara v. Atty Gen USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: PEDRO RAMOS-LARA
Represented By: Raymond G. Lahoud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTY GEN USA
Represented By: Eric H. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?