Oneil Burns v. Atty Gen USA
Petitioner: ONEIL ST. ELMO BURNS
Respondent: ATTY GEN USA
Case Number: 11-3372
Filed: September 2, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3010729864 CLERK ORDER dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR Misc. 107.2(b), for failure to file a brief and appendix on behalf of appellant. Case terminated on 11/28/2011.
October 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3010677785 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Petitioner O'neil St. Elmo Burns due on or before 11/15/2011. Appendix due on or before 11/15/2011.
September 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3010643397 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Oneil Burns v. Atty Gen USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ONEIL ST. ELMO BURNS
Represented By: Joan O. Pinnock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTY GEN USA
Represented By: Eric H. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?