Nationwide Mutl Ins v. Timothy Shaw, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATIONWIDE MUTL INS
Defendant - Appellee: TIMOTHY SHAW, individually; d/b/a Shaw Brothers Donkey Ball Co. and ROBERT EISENBERRY
Case Number: 11-3573
Filed: September 21, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 6, 2012 Nationwide Mutl Ins v. Timothy Shaw

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nationwide Mutl Ins v. Timothy Shaw, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: NATIONWIDE MUTL INS
Represented By: Charles E. Haddick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: TIMOTHY SHAW, individually; d/b/a Shaw Brothers Donkey Ball Co.
Represented By: Michael R. Goffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: ROBERT EISENBERRY
Represented By: Michael R. Goffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?