USA v. Harry Katzin, et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| HARRY KATZIN, MICHAEL KATZIN and MARK LOUIS KATZIN, SR. |
| 12-2548 |
| June 25, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 United States v. Katzin
|
| USA v. Harry Katzin |
|
United States v. Katzin
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3011753030
PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: MCKEE, Chief Judge, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ and VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 70. Authoring Judge VAN ANTWERPEN, with whom RENDELL, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, VANASKIE, and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges, join; with separate dissenting opinion by Judge GREENAWAY, JR., joined by McKEE, Chief Judge, and AMBRO, FUENTES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges; and with separate dissenting opinion by Judge SMITH, joined by McKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO, FIUENTES, and GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges.
|
|
Filing
3011480703
ORDER filed (Coram: MCKEE, Chief Judge, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ and VAN ANTWERPEN*, Circuit Judges) granting the petition for en banc rehearing. The Clerk of this Court shall list the case for rehearing en banc May 28, 2014. The opinion and judgment entered October 22, 2013 are hereby vacated, filed. Authoring Judge: McKee, Chief Circuit Judge. *(Will participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d. Cir. I.O.P. 9.6.4).
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
