Zhen Lin v. Attorney General United State
Petitioner: ZHEN FEN LIN
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 12-3113
Filed: July 27, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3011266182 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: AMBRO, JORDAN and BARRY, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 4.
April 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3011241439 Calendared for Wednesday, 05/08/2013.
July 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3010971095 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Zhen Lin v. Attorney General United State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ZHEN FEN LIN
Represented By: Vlad Kuzmin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Eric H. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?