Allied Healthcare Products v. Ronald Patterson, et al
| ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS INC., United States for the use of Allied Healthcare Products, Inc. |
| RONALD D. PATTERSON and AEROPLATE CORPORATION |
| 12-3125 |
| July 31, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Miller Act |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Allied Healthcare Products v. Ronald Patterson, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS INC., United States for the use of Allied Healthcare Products, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | James W. Adelman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: RONALD D. PATTERSON | |
| Represented By: | John J. O'Brien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: AEROPLATE CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | John J. O'Brien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
