Fen Lin v. Attorney General United State
| FEN LIN |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 12-3938 |
| October 16, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Fen Lin v. Attorney General United States |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3011595193
NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: RENDELL, SMITH and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 6. Judge: SMITH Authoring.
|
|
Filing
3011238676
Calendared for Tuesday, 07/16/2013.
|
|
Filing
3011048617
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Fen Lin v. Attorney General United State | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: FEN LIN | |
| Represented By: | Gary J. Yerman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Eric H. Holder |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
