Roy Langbord, et al v. United States Department of th, et al
| ROY LANGBORD, DAVID LANGBORD and JOAN LANGBORD |
| UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, US MINT, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, ACTING GENJERAL COUNSEL UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DIRECTOR UNITED STATES MINT, CHIEF COUNSEL UNITED STATES MINT, DEPUTY DIRECTOR UNITED STATES MINT and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| TEN 1933 DOUBLE EAGLE GOLD PIECES |
| 12-4574 |
| December 28, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012368475
PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: MCKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RENDELL and FUENTES, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 79. Judge: HARDIMAN Authoring Circuit Judge, with whom AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, VANASKIE, and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges, join. JORDAN, Circuit Judge, Concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. RENDELL, Dissenting with whom McKEE, Chief Judge, and KRAUSE, Circuit Judge join.
|
Filing
3012029593
ORDER filed (Coram: MCKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, *SLOVITER and *RENDELL, Circuit Judges) vacating the opinion and judgment filed April 17, 2015. Authoring Judge: McKee, Chief Judge. *As to panel rehearing only; will participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d. Cir. I.O.P. 9.6.4.
|
Filing
3011936582
PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: MCKEE, Chief Judge, RENDELL and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 60. Judge: RENDELL Authoring, Judge: SLOVITER Dissenting.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.