CM3 Building Solutions Inc. v. Ronald Patterson, et al
| AEROPLATE CORPORATION and RONALD D. PATTERSON |
| CM3 BUILDING SOLUTIONS INC., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF CM3 BUILDING SOLUTIONS, INC. |
| 13-1639 |
| March 8, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Miller Act |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: CM3 Building Solutions Inc. v. Ronald Patterson, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: AEROPLATE CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | John J. O'Brien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: RONALD D. PATTERSON | |
| Represented By: | John J. O'Brien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: CM3 BUILDING SOLUTIONS INC., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF CM3 BUILDING SOLUTIONS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey C. Venzie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
