Jose Rodriguez-Celaya v. Attorney General United State
JOSE RODRIGUEZ-CELAYA, a/k/a Jose Rodriquez-Zelaya |
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
13-2311 |
May 7, 2013 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Jose Rodriguez-Celaya v. Attorney General United States |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3011865434 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: AMBRO, SHWARTZ and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 6. We deny the two motions to dismiss and grant the the petition for review. We also grant the motion to file the supplemental appendix. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Jose Rodriguez-Celaya v. Attorney General United State | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: JOSE RODRIGUEZ-CELAYA, a/k/a Jose Rodriquez-Zelaya | |
Represented By: | Jose Rodriguez-Celaya |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Eric H. Holder |
Represented By: | Thomas W. Hussey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.