USA v. William Davenport
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: WILLIAM DAVENPORT, aka Little One
Case Number: 13-3644
Filed: September 5, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 6, 2015 Summary United States v. Davenport

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3011838982 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: FISHER, JORDAN and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 12. Judge: HARDIMAN Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. William Davenport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Christy H. Fawcett
Represented By: Amy C. Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: WILLIAM DAVENPORT, aka Little One
Represented By: William Davenport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?