Anthony Catanzaro v. Nora Fischer, et al
| PATRICK M. ROGAN |
| ANTHONY P. CATANZARO |
| NORA B. FISCHER, Sued in her individual and official capacities, MICHAEL D. COLLINS and JAMES M. MUNLEY |
| 13-4728 |
| December 18, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Mandate Reissued, filed. (JK) [Entered: 09/11/2014 08:44 AM] |
ORDER (JORDAN, Authoring Judge, COWEN and BARRY, Circuit Judges) denying Petition for panel rehearing by Appellant Anthony P. Catanzaro, filed. (TMK) [Entered: 09/03/2014 09:32 AM]
|
| Response filed by Appellant Anthony Catanzaro to the 8/4/2014 Noncompliance Order.. Certificate of Service dated 08/15/2014.--[Edited 08/22/2014 by JK] (JK) [Entered: 08/19/2014 11:48 AM] |
| NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Appellant Anthony P. Catanzaro requesting Motion to Add Exhibit to the Petition for Rehearing. Compliance due 08/18/2014. (JK) [Entered: 08/04/2014 04:16 PM] |
| PETITION filed by Appellant Anthony P. Catanzaro for Rehearing before Original Panel. Certificate of Service dated 08/01/2014. (JK) [Entered: 08/19/2014 11:50 AM] |
|
ORDER (Clerk) recalling the mandate issued on 07/14/2014. Mandate was issued in error. (JK) [Entered: 07/17/2014 02:28 PM]
|
| MANDATE ISSUED, filed. (JK) [Entered: 07/14/2014 09:48 AM] |
| NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: JORDAN, COWEN and BARRY, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 6. (JK) [Entered: 06/20/2014 11:31 AM] |
| SUBMITTED (Pro Se - 3rd Cir. LAR 34.1 (a)) on Friday, June 20, 2014. Panel: JORDAN, COWEN, BARRY, Circuit Judges. (PM) [Entered: 06/20/2014 08:34 AM] |
| JUDGMENT, Affirmed. Costs will not be taxed. (JK) [Entered: 06/20/2014 11:35 AM] |
| CALENDARED for Friday, 06/20/2014. (PM) [Entered: 06/06/2014 12:12 PM] |
| PRO SE REPLY BRIEF on behalf of Appellant Anthony P. Catanzaro, filed. Pages: 5. Certificate of Service dated 05/29/2014 by US mail.[Changed docket text]--[Edited 06/17/2014 by MCW] (MCW) [Entered: 06/17/2014 11:44 AM] |
| ECF FILER: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for Addendum to Appellee's Brief. Service made on 05/12/2014 by US mail. [Text edited]--[Edited 05/15/2014 by EAF] (MDC) [Entered: 05/12/2014 11:00 AM] |
| COMPLIANCE RECEIVED. Electronic Addendum to Brief including identical/virus certifications received from Appellee Michael D. Collins. (EAF) [Entered: 05/06/2014 11:12 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC ADDENDUM to BRIEF on behalf of Appellee Michael D. Collins containing Per Court Order re Compliance with FRAP 28 and LAR 31.0(b(3) and 31.0(c), filed. Certificate of Service dated 05/05/2014 by US mail, ECF. (MDC) [Entered: 05/05/2014 08:47 PM] |
|
ORDER (SMITH and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges) granting Motion to be excused from filing a brief filed by Appellees James M. Munley and Nora B. Fischer, filed. Panel No.: DCO-073. SMITH, Authoring Judge. (JK) [Entered: 05/05/2014 10:57 AM]
|
| Appellant Anthony P. Catanzaro verbally granted an extension of time to file reply brief until 05/29/2014, pursuant to Third Cir. LAR 31.4. (JK) [Entered: 05/02/2014 02:13 PM] |
| NON COMPLIANCE Order issued to Appellee Michael D. Collins regarding the brief filed on 04/28/2014. Please open the attachment for the full text of the Order. Compliance due by 05/05/2014. This Order does not change the deadline for filing the next brief. (EAF) [Entered: 05/01/2014 10:13 AM] |
| HARD COPY RECEIVED from Appellee Michael D. Collins - Brief. Copies: 7. Received: 12. (RM) [Entered: 04/30/2014 11:19 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC BRIEF on behalf of Appellee Michael D. Collins, filed. Certificate of Service dated 04/28/2014 by ECF. (MDC) [Entered: 04/28/2014 08:44 PM] |
| ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellees Nora B. Fischer and James M. Munley for leave to be excused from filing a brief pursuant to LAR 31.2. Certificate of Service dated 04/15/2014. (KLM) [Entered: 04/15/2014 12:25 PM] |
| ECF FILER: LETTER from Attorney J. Timothy Hinton, Jr., Esq. for Appellee Patrick M. Rogan, that the party will not be participating. Certificate of Service dated 04/09/2014.--[Edited 04/11/2014 by PDB] (JTH) [Entered: 04/09/2014 04:48 PM] |
| PRO SE BRIEF with Exhibits attached on behalf of Appellant Anthony P. Catanzaro, filed. Pages: 4, Certificate of Service dated 03/25/2014 by US mail. (KEL) [Entered: 03/28/2014 04:27 PM] |
|
ORDER (Clerk) granting Motion for extension of time to file brief and appendix filed by Appellant Anthony P. Catanzaro. 03/25/2014., filed. (JK) [Entered: 02/10/2014 03:44 PM]
|
| MOTION filed by Appellant Anthony P. Catanzaro for a 35 Day Extension of Time to File Brief and Appendix or until 03/25/2014. Response due on 02/18/2014. Certificate of Service dated 02/04/2014. (JK) [Entered: 02/06/2014 03:27 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Anthony P. Catanzaro due on or before 02/18/2014. Appendix due on or before 02/18/2014. (JK) [Entered: 01/08/2014 11:12 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Pro Se on behalf of Appellee(s) Michael D. Collins. (MDC) [Entered: 12/23/2013 12:34 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from J. Timothy Hinton, Jr., Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) Patrick Rogan, Esq.. (JTH) [Entered: 12/23/2013 10:35 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Kate L. Mershimer, Assistant U.S. Attorney on behalf of Appellee(s) Judge Nora B. Fischer, Hon. James M. Munley. (KLM) [Entered: 12/20/2013 11:56 AM] |
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 12/18/2013 11:50 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Anthony P. Catanzaro in District Court No. 3-12-cv-00862. (JK) [Entered: 12/18/2013 11:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
