Sandeep Mehta v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correc
SANDEEP MOHAN MEHTA |
WARDEN MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER |
14-3166 |
July 2, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Sandeep Mehta v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correc |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3011861877 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: AMBRO, VANASKIE and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 9 We will vacate the Magistrate Judge's June 12, 2014 order and remand with instructions that the Magistrate grant Mehta's habeas petition and direct the BOP to credit Mehta's sentence for the time spent in custody in Egland. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Sandeep Mehta v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: SANDEEP MOHAN MEHTA | |
Represented By: | Sandeep Mohan Mehta |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: WARDEN MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER | |
Represented By: | Rebecca R. Haywood |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.