Gursheel Dhillon, et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, et al
GURSHEEL S. DHILLON, On behalf of the United States of America and all Health Related Plans that purchased Lidoderm and cash payers |
MAX H. WEATHERSBY, JR., ex rel., On behalf of the States of CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI and the D.C., MK LITIGATION PARTNERSHIP 2011 LLP, ex. rel. On behalf of the states of CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI, and the D.C. and PEGGY RYAN, United States of America ex rel. Peggy Ryan, States of: FL, NY, MA, CA, VA, DE, IL, NV, GA, HI, IN, MT, NH, NJ, NM, OK, RI, TEN, TX |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC, ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS INC and JAMES R. HAILEY |
14-3377 |
July 25, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Gursheel Dhillon v. Endo Pharmaceuticals |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3011987829 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: RENDELL, CHAGARES and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 11. ALD-200. We grant Ryan's motion and will summarily affirm the District Court's June 23, 2014 order. Ryan's motion to expedite is granted. Ryan's motion to dismiss or quash the appeal is denied as unnecessary. Dhillion's motion to strike is denied. Dhillion's two motions to summarily remand are denied as moot. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Gursheel Dhillon, et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: GURSHEEL S. DHILLON, On behalf of the United States of America and all Health Related Plans that purchased Lidoderm and cash payers | |
Represented By: | Daniel L. Cevallos |
Represented By: | Andrew P. Davis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: MAX H. WEATHERSBY, JR., ex rel., On behalf of the States of CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI and the D.C. | |
Represented By: | Alan M. Freeman |
Represented By: | Nicholas C. Harbist |
Represented By: | W. Scott Simmer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: MK LITIGATION PARTNERSHIP 2011 LLP, ex. rel. On behalf of the states of CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, MN, MT, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, OK, RI, TN, TX, VA, WI, and the D.C. | |
Represented By: | Alan M. Freeman |
Represented By: | Nicholas C. Harbist |
Represented By: | W. Scott Simmer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: PEGGY RYAN, United States of America ex rel. Peggy Ryan, States of: FL, NY, MA, CA, VA, DE, IL, NV, GA, HI, IN, MT, NH, NJ, NM, OK, RI, TEN, TX | |
Represented By: | Christopher Casper |
Represented By: | John Newcomer |
Represented By: | Elaine Stromgren |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Intervenor-plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Michael D. Granston |
Represented By: | Margaret L. Hutchinson |
Represented By: | Gerald B. Sullivan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS INC | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: JAMES R. HAILEY | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.