Brian Schmigel v. Miroslav Uchal
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRIAN SCHMIGEL, an adult individual
Defendant - Appellee: MIROSLAV UCHAL, MD, FASC, an adult individual
Case Number: 14-3476
Filed: August 4, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Medical Malpractice

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 2, 2015 Summary Schmigel v. Uchal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3012062276 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: RENDELL, SMITH and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 35. Judge: KRAUSE Authoring, Judge: RENDELL Dissenting.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Brian Schmigel v. Miroslav Uchal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: BRIAN SCHMIGEL, an adult individual
Represented By: Noah P. Fardo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MIROSLAV UCHAL, MD, FASC, an adult individual
Represented By: Kristin L. Pieseski
Represented By: Timothy R. Stienstraw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?