Paula Maliandi v. Montclair State University
PAULA MALIANDI |
MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY |
14-3812 |
September 5, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Family and Medical Leave Act |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Maliandi v. Montclair State University |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3012496895 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, KRAUSE, Circuit Judges and *THOMPSON, District Judge. Total Pages: 43. Judge: KRAUSE Authoring. *The Honorable Anne E. Thompson, District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, sitting by designation. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Paula Maliandi v. Montclair State University | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: PAULA MALIANDI | |
Represented By: | Michael Dichiara |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY | |
Represented By: | Sarah T. Darrow |
Represented By: | Jennifer J. McGruther |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.