Raymond Zong v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner Sm
| RAYMOND ZONG |
| MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC, A wholly owned Subsidiary of Bank of America Corp. |
| 14-4239 |
| October 24, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Raymond Zong v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner Sm |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012143026
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: AMBRO, GREENAWAY JR. and SLOVITER, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 7.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Raymond Zong v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner Sm | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: RAYMOND ZONG | |
| Represented By: | Raymond Zong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE FENNER SMITH INC, A wholly owned Subsidiary of Bank of America Corp. | |
| Represented By: | Michael P. Avila |
| Represented By: | Karen P. Gaster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
