Myron Giddens v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions
Plaintiff - Appellant: MYRON GIDDENS
Defendant - Appellee: UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS
Case Number: 14-4291
Filed: October 28, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 16, 2015 Myron Giddens v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3012019043 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: RENDELL, GREENAWAY JR. and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 7. Gidden's motion to add addendum to his reply brief is granted.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Myron Giddens v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: MYRON GIDDENS
Represented By: Myron Giddens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS
Represented By: Ariana W. Arnold
Represented By: Lori A. Brewington
Represented By: Jennifer C. Jauffret
Represented By: Emmett F. McGee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?