Laurence Kaplan v. Saint Peter's Healthcare Syste, et al
Plaintiff - Appellee: LAURENCE KAPLAN, On behalf of himself, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: SAINT PETER'S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, RONALD C. RAK, SUSAN BALLESTERO, an individual and GARRICK STOLDT, an individual
Case Number: 15-1172
Filed: January 20, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 29, 2015 Summary Kaplan v. Saint Peter's Healthcare Sys.
July 13, 2017 Summary Kaplan v. Saint Peter's Healthcare System
January 29, 2018 Summary Kaplan v. Saint Peter's Healthcare System

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012673707 ORDER (MCKEE, AMBRO and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges), Reversing the judgment of the District Court dated March 31, 2014. Costs are taxed in favor of the Appellants, filed. Judge: THOMAS L. AMBRO, Authoring
December 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3012166016 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: MCKEE, Chief Judge, AMBRO and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 27. Judge: AMBRO Authoring. (Notice regenerated to reflect that Opinion is Precedential).--[Edited 12/29/2015 by MLR]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Laurence Kaplan v. Saint Peter's Healthcare Syste, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: LAURENCE KAPLAN, On behalf of himself, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Daniel S. Sommers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: SAINT PETER'S HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Greenbaum
Represented By: James M. Hirschhorn
Represented By: Katherine M. Lieb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: RONALD C. RAK
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Greenbaum
Represented By: James M. Hirschhorn
Represented By: Katherine M. Lieb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: SUSAN BALLESTERO, an individual
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Greenbaum
Represented By: James M. Hirschhorn
Represented By: Katherine M. Lieb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: GARRICK STOLDT, an individual
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Greenbaum
Represented By: James M. Hirschhorn
Represented By: Katherine M. Lieb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?