Group Against Smog and Polluti v. Shenango Inc
Plaintiff - Appellant: GROUP AGAINST SMOG AND POLLUTION
Defendant - Appellee: SHENANGO INC
Case Number: 15-2041
Filed: April 28, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 6, 2016 Summary Group Against Smog & Pollution, Inc. v. Shenango Inc

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3012171289 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: FUENTES, SHWARTZ and VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 29. Judge: VAN ANTWERPEN Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Group Against Smog and Polluti v. Shenango Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: GROUP AGAINST SMOG AND POLLUTION
Represented By: John K. Baillie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SHENANGO INC
Represented By: James D. Miller
Represented By: Varun Shekhar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?