In Re: Net Pay Solutions Inc
MARKIAN R. SLOBODIAN |
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE |
15-2833 |
August 3, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Bankruptcy Withdrawal 28 USC 157 |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
In Re: Net Pay Solutions Inc |
In Re: Net Pay Solutions Inc v. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3012288589 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: SMITH, HARDIMAN and *SLOVITER, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 21. Judge: HARDIMAN Authoring. *The Honorable Dolores K. Sloviter assumed inactive status on April 4, 2016, after the argument and conference in this case, but before the filing of the opinion. This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 46(d) and Third Circuit I.O.P. Chapter 12. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In Re: Net Pay Solutions Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: MARKIAN R. SLOBODIAN | |
Represented By: | Markian R. Slobodian |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE | |
Represented By: | Ari D. Kunofsky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.