Sebastian Richardson v. Director Federal Bureau of Pri, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: SEBASTIAN RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee: DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Case Number: 15-2876
Filed: August 7, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 15, 2016 Summary Richardson v. Dir., Fed. Bureau of Prisons

RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3012355116 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: SMITH, HARDIMAN and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 44. Judge: SMITH Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sebastian Richardson v. Director Federal Bureau of Pri, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: SEBASTIAN RICHARDSON
Represented By: Francis J. Dermody
Represented By: Alexandra Morgan-Kurtz
Represented By: Jennifer J. Tobin
Represented By: Su Ming Yeh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Represented By: Michael J. Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?