US Bank NA, et al v. La Mar Gunn
US BANK NA, as Trustee for the Holders of the EQCC Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates Series 1998-3 and SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC |
LA MAR GUNN |
15-2980 |
August 19, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Torts to Land |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER (CHAGARES, GREENAWAY, JR. and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges) denying the motion to reopen case and for leave to file opening brief filed by Appellant La Mar Gunn, filed. Panel No.: GCO-023. RESTREPO, Authoring Judge.--[Edited 07/01/2016 by JK] (JK) [Entered: 06/30/2016 10:41 AM] |
ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees Select Portfolio Servicing Inc and US Bank NA to Motion to reopen case. Certificate of Service dated 05/26/2016. (DAD) [Entered: 05/26/2016 11:43 AM] |
ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant La Mar Gunn to Reopen Case and for Leave to file Opening Brief. Certificate of Service dated 05/19/2016.--[Edited 05/20/2016 by JK] (LG) [Entered: 05/19/2016 04:54 PM] |
CLERK ORDER dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR Misc. 107.2(b), for failure to file a brief and appendix on behalf of appellant. Case terminated on 05/10/2016. (JK) [Entered: 05/10/2016 02:45 PM] |
CLERK ORDER advising that the case will not be submitted for possible dismissal due to a jurisdictional defect. Accordingly, the Clerk shall issue a briefing schedule. (MW) [Entered: 03/23/2016 11:02 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant La Mar Gunn due on or before 05/02/2016. Appendix due on or before 05/02/2016. (JK) [Entered: 03/23/2016 01:04 PM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael P. Pest on behalf of Appellee(s) US BANK NA, as Trustee for the Holders of the EQCC Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates Series 1998-3 and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (MPP) [Entered: 10/01/2015 04:29 PM] |
ORDER (Clerk) It appearing that Appellant was granted in forma pauperis status in the District Court and such status carried over to this appeal, It is Ordered that the Order entered September 10, 2015 dismissing the appeal for failure to pay the filing fee is hereby vacated and the case reinstated, filed. [-The entry did not include the document. Notice is being resent.]--[Edited 09/10/2015 by CJG] (CJG) [Entered: 09/10/2015 02:00 PM] |
CLERK ORDER dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a), for failure to pay the filing fee for the notice of appeal. Case terminated on 09/10/2015. (JK) [Entered: 09/10/2015 12:28 PM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Dorothy A. Davis on behalf of Appellee(s) US Bank NA, as Trustee of the EQCC Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates Series 1998-3 and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (DAD) [Entered: 09/01/2015 05:08 PM] |
ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee US Bank NA, filed. (DAD) [Entered: 09/01/2015 05:12 PM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Samuel P. Trumbull on behalf of Appellee(s) US Bank NA, as Trustee for the Holders of the EQCC Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates Series 1998-3 and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.. (SPT) [Entered: 09/01/2015 05:10 PM] |
ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Select Portfolio Servicing Inc, filed. (DAD) [Entered: 09/01/2015 05:12 PM] |
LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (JW) [Entered: 08/21/2015 03:44 PM] |
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 08/19/2015 01:56 PM] |
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant La Mar Gunn in District Court No. 1-11-cv-01155. (SB) [Entered: 08/19/2015 01:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.