Karen Tucker v. Secretary United States Depart
KAREN E. TUCKER |
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES |
15-3664 |
November 4, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Ovrpmnts Under the Medicare Act |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Karen Tucker v. Secretary United States Depart |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3012240344 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION, denying Appellee's motion for summary affirmance as moot. Coram: FUENTES, VANASKIE and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 4. The Secretary's motion for summary affirmance is denied as moot. --[Edited 03/22/2016 by AWI] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Karen Tucker v. Secretary United States Depart | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: KAREN E. TUCKER | |
Represented By: | Karen E. Tucker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES | |
Represented By: | Caroline A. Sadlowski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.