Lamar Coleman v. United States Parole Commissio
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAMAR COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Case Number: 15-3672
Filed: November 5, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 17, 2016 Lamar Coleman v. United States Parole Commissio

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3012235841 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: FISHER, SHWARTZ and COWEN, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 7. Appellant's motion to stricke appellee's brief is denied.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lamar Coleman v. United States Parole Commissio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: LAMAR COLEMAN
Represented By: Lamar Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Represented By: Kate L. Mershimer
Represented By: G. Michael Thiel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?