Vizant Technologies LLC, et al v. Julie Whitchurch, et al
Plaintiff - Appellee: VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC and JOSEPH BIZZARRO
Defendant - Appellant: JULIE P. WHITCHURCH and JAMIE DAVIS
Case Number: 16-1178
Filed: January 29, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 13, 2017 Vizant Technologies LLC v. Julie Whitchurch
February 2, 2017 Summary Vizant Technologies LLC v. Julie Whitchurch

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012528638 AMENDED NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: SHWARTZ, COWEN and FUENTES, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 15. Appellees' motion to dismiss this appeal is granted in part, and we will dismiss this appeal as to all orders except (1) the order entering summary judgment and the interlocutory orders related to that issue, (2) the permanent injunction, and (3) the order at ECF No. 215 denying Whitchurch's Rule 60(b) motion. We will affirm those orders. In light of our partial jurisdiction over this appeal, appellees' motion to sanction Whitchurch for filing an improper appeal is denied. Whitchurch's motion to proceed on the original record is granted to the extent that we have reviewed the original record as necessary to decide this appeal. To the extent that the parties' filings request other forms of relief, they are denied.
January 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012511676 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: SHWARTZ, COWEN and FUENTES, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 15. Appellees' motion to dismiss this appeal is granted in part, and we will dismiss this appeal as to all orders except (1) the order entering summary judgment and the interlocutory orders related to that issue, (2) the preliminary injunction, and (3) the order at ECF No. 215 denying Whitchurch's Rule 60(b) motion. Appellees' motion to sanction Whitchurch for filing an improper appeal is denied. Whitchurch's motion to proceed on the original record is granted. To the extent that the parties' filings request to other forms of relief, they are denied.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vizant Technologies LLC, et al v. Julie Whitchurch, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Represented By: Edward T. Kang
Represented By: Gregory H. Mathews
Represented By: Jason Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: JOSEPH BIZZARRO
Represented By: Edward T. Kang
Represented By: Gregory H. Mathews
Represented By: Jason Powell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: JULIE P. WHITCHURCH
Represented By: Julie P. Whitchurch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: JAMIE DAVIS
Represented By: Jamie Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?